Cite relevant sources when generalizing about a problem. This shows that you know which other experts, especially recognized ones, have already contributed to the conversation. It also shows that you have done your homework, that they have read recent literature, and that your position is reasonably considered and not based on pure speculation. For example: Typically, such calls appear in the introduction or conclusion to show how the argument is associated with a belief that the public already has, whether or not they have already thought about your position in the same way before. The arguments are among the most convincing documents we come across when reading. To develop a strong argument, you need to take a stand on a topic, present the problem to your readers in a way that then leads to considering your position reasonable, developing reasons, and providing evidence of your position. In this guide and related topics, you will learn about the writing and research processes that help authors develop effective and informed arguments. The use of a counter-example or a proceeding that goes against the opposition`s assertion is a way of refuting an opposing argument. If it can be shown that their research is inadequate, it can be shown that their position is flawed or at least inconclusive. Casting a shadow of a doubt on the opposite argument provides strong evidence that your argument has value. Be sure to use real cases where your opponent`s position does not take into account the counterexample.

A call to action works best in deductive arguments that suggest solutions to problems (e.g.B social problems) or point to additional research needed. He goes even further by addressing what an audience`s point of persuasion was in the first place. If your goal was to advocate for change and your argument is compelling, your conclusion gives you the opportunity to suggest the steps an audience sold in your position can take to make that change a reality. For example: The introduction establishes the context of an argument: it informs the public about the subject in question, the dominant arguments of the opposing parties and the position of the author. It sets the tone for the argument and sets the boundaries and disciplinary boundaries that your particular academic audience will expect. Finally, the best advice is to be constantly aware of the arguments you don`t want to address and constantly refine your opening statement to avoid having to argue it. In other words, as you move towards the end of your research, close and lock all the doors that you don`t want the opposition to walk through. There are no good or bad positions.

There are only unjustified positions – those that are not supported by relevant and adequate evidence. Use the published documents to determine that your problem has already been addressed in detail, either by experts in the field or in society at large. Then show that your location, which your audience already knows a little bit about, is a whole new point of view. For example, if the argument is open, the conclusion should remind the audience of the details of the topic to be argued, the position you have taken, and give them something new to consider. If it`s tight, it should justify your position. The conclusion is the perfect place to bring home the central points of your argument and convince the public that your case is undeniable "given the evidence". By definition, an argument requires the existence of a contentious problem. In other words, for a dispute to take place, there must be at least two parties. If there are two or more contentious positions, each is part of the context.

Acceptable academic evidence strongly depends on the person to whom it is presented, in what field they work, and the orientation and objectives of the position represented. To be convincing, it must be factual, well-founded, logical and resist opposing arguments. Inclus is a mix of facts, research, quotes, experiences and the work of other people. One way to create context for your readers and create common ground is to start with a definition of the topic that anyone can share, and then introduce a problem based on the common definition. For example, taking your audience into account doesn`t mean playing with the teacher or ta. To convince a particular person that your own opinions are reasonable, you need to consider their way of thinking. If you were writing a thesis for a sociology/TA professor, your analysis would obviously be different from what would be if you were writing for a professor of economics, history, or communication/TA. You need to make specific decisions about the terms you need to explain, the basic information you need to provide, and the details you need to convince that particular reader. When we appeal to the logical sensibilities of an audience, we often rely on long-standing relationships between events and facts. For example, if we can show that one event leads to another, we establish a logical relationship (e.B.

cause/effect, deductive thinking, etc.). Because these relationships are deeply rooted in our thinking and language, they are relatively easy to use. Nevertheless, it will be useful to check the range of logical calls available for writing arguments. Imagine that you are a yacht that is blown away by the weight of evidence for different positions while reading. You may have thought you were heading to position A, but you may be influenced by the strength of the evidence that directs you to different places. The answers you will find will help determine what type of position is most effective and what to include in the introduction, what type of evidence to present, and how the presentation should be organized. These types of arguments require a different adoption strategy, usually starting with an explanation of the problem and a brief review of the gaps in the solutions proposed so far. This is an excellent approach to presenting a position statement that an existing problem needs to be looked at from a different angle. UHWO Writing Center (1998) Drafting of a position paper. Retrieved August 26, 2002, from the World Wide Web: homepages.uhwo.hawaii.edu/~writing/position.htm Diction refers to the choice of words for the expression of ideas; the construction, arrangement and application of the words in your essay in terms of clarity, accuracy, variety, etc.; expression; and language. Students often tend to use whimsical words and extravagant images in the hope that it will make them look smarter when the result is actually a confusing mess. While this approach can sometimes be effective, it is advisable to choose clear words and express your ideas as accurately as possible.

Many students make the mistake of thinking that the content of their work is all that matters. While content is important, it won`t mean much if the reader can`t understand what you`re trying to say. You may have good ideas in your article, but if you can`t communicate them effectively, you won`t get a very good rating. When writing your article, keep the following in mind: One of the best ways to do this is to suggest a common definition of the problem. Another is to start with a literature review of previous work that shows where and how your position emerged from previous work and how it enters or contributes to that conversation. Refuting opposing positions is an important part of building an argument. It`s not just important, it`s expected. Responding to the arguments of those who disagree is a way of identifying the opposition and uncovering the main weaknesses of its argument. This allows you to define the context parameters or limits within which your argument will be included.

It is best to start with a summary. Value claims inherently involve a judgment based on comparing and contrasting one position with another, assigning to each a value of good or evil, better or worse. For example, "Danielle Steele is the best romantic novelist of the last quarter century." Like a debate, a position paper presents a page of a contentious opinion on a topic. The purpose of a position paper is to convince the public that your opinion is valid and justifiable. The ideas you consider should be carefully considered when choosing a topic, developing your argument, and organizing your article. It is very important to make sure that you address all aspects of the problem and present it in a way that is easy for your audience to understand. Your job is to take sides on the argument and convince your audience that you have a thorough knowledge of the topic being presented. It is important to support your reasoning with evidence to ensure the validity of your claims, as well as refute counterclaims to show that you are well informed on both sides. You may have an idea of what your position will be like before starting an essay: you may have given a lecture on the subject and formed opinions; The question or topic may resonate with personal experiences or you may consider something common sense. On the other hand, you can start without any idea what your final position will be. As you learn more about the problem you`ve selected or assigned, you may notice that your attitude changes. Stay open in this regard: this will help you clarify your final position and focus on a narrow and contentious point.

Below are some useful tips to help you. Argumentative essays (the majority of academic essays) require you to convince the reader of this position with a series of well-founded arguments (those supported by credible evidence) that lead them to your conclusion. The goal is to convince the reader that your conclusion is logical and reasonable based on the evidence you provide. .